- 3 - several years after her injury, but only after she successfully appealed the denial through a State administrative proceeding. Pursuant to the provisions of her long-term disability plan, she was required to apply for SSDI coverage, which became effective sometime during 1994. The SSDI benefits that she received reduced, dollar for dollar, her long-term disability benefits. Similarly, her SSDI benefits were offset, dollar for dollar, by the worker’s compensation benefits that she received. See 42 U.S.C. sec. 424a (1994). Receiving benefits from three sources further complicated matters, and she repeatedly received inconsistent notices from the payors regarding overpayments and other irregularities. According to a Form SSA-1099 issued by the Social Security Administration, petitioner received SSDI benefits totaling $10,779 during 1997. Because of the offset provisions referred to above, worker’s compensation benefits of $8,406 received by petitioner during 1997 are included in the amount reported on the Form SSA-1099. Petitioners reported adjusted gross income of $41,600 on their 1997 return, which amount consists entirely of the wages earned by Robert Geiszler during that year. As in prior years, none of the benefits that petitioner received on account of her injury are included in petitioners’ income.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011