- 7 - they did not otherwise live with her during 2000, and also that she did not live at petitioner’s home in Dale City. Respondent points to the school records of Joshua and Joseph and to Ms. Jackson’s return for 2000 to support his allegation that Ms. Jackson lived in the same house as petitioner during 2000; however, we do not find these documents to be dispositive. We find Ms. Jackson’s testimony to be credible and conclude that she did not live in petitioner’s house during 2000. We conclude that petitioner was the custodial parent and Joshua and Joseph, therefore, are treated as receiving over half of their support from petitioner. Id. Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to the dependency exemption deductions for Joshua and Joseph for the taxable year 2000. 2. Head-of-Household Filing Status As relevant here, an individual shall be considered a head of household if, and only if, he is not married at the close of his taxable year, is not a surviving spouse, and maintains as his home a household which constitutes for more than one-half of the taxable year the principal place of abode, as a member of such household, of an unmarried child of the taxpayer. Sec. 2(b)(1)(A)(i); sec. 1.2-2(b)(1), (b)(3), Income Tax Regs. A taxpayer shall be considered as maintaining a household only if he pays over half of the cost thereof for the taxable year. Sec. 2(b)(1); sec. 1.2-2(d), Income Tax Regs. The expenses ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011