-16-
services. Given that the contracts did not address any sale by
GBI of the unusable materials, we conclude that any proceeds
which GBI received from such a sale were incidental to the
underlying contracts and merely an economic advantage derived
from the contract. This factor favors respondent.
For the foregoing reasons, we sustain respondent’s
determination. We have considered all arguments made by the
parties and have rejected those arguments not discussed herein as
irrelevant or without merit. Accordingly,
Decision will be entered
for respondent.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011