Clyde E. Hack and Carole J. Hack - Page 4




                                         -4-                                          
          of (1) respondent’s intention to levy under section 6331 and                
          (2) petitioners’ right under section 6330 to a hearing with                 
          respondent’s Office of Appeals (Appeals).  Enclosed with the                
          final notice was a copy of Form 12153, Request for a Collection             
          Due Process Hearing.                                                        
               On August 5, 2000, petitioners sent to respondent the Form             
          12153 requesting the referenced hearing.  Petitioners attached to           
          the Form a request that the hearing officer have at the hearing             
          “the specific Code Section making me [petitioners] ‘liable’ for             
          the income tax at issue, along with Form 23C” and “The delegation           
          of authority from the Secretary authorizing such persons [IRS               
          employees] to impose a ‘frivolous’ penalty.”  On January                    
          10, 2001, respondent sent to petitioners a letter stating that              
          petitioners were precluded by section 6330(c)(2)(B) from raising            
          liability as an issue and that all other issues raised by                   
          petitioners were without merit.  Respondent enclosed with that              
          letter a transcript of petitioners’ account.                                
               On January 30, 2001, Appeals Officer Wiley Davis held with             
          petitioners a hearing under section 6330.  On May 8, 2001,                  
          respondent issued to petitioners duplicate Notices of                       
          Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320            
          and/or 6330 for 1997.  These notices reflected the determination            
          of Appeals to sustain the proposed levy.                                    








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011