Clyde E. Hack and Carole J. Hack - Page 5




                                         -5-                                          
          Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330 for 1998.  These notices           
          reflected the determination of Appeals to sustain the proposed              
          levy.                                                                       
                                     Discussion                                       
               Section 6331(a) provides that if any person liable to pay              
          any tax neglects or refuses to pay such tax within 10 days after            
          notice and demand for payment, the Secretary may collect such tax           
          by levy on the person’s property.  Section 6331(d) provides that            
          at least 30 days before enforcing collection by levy on the                 
          person’s property, the Secretary must provide the person with a             
          final notice of intent to levy, including notice of the                     
          administrative appeals available to the person.                             
               Section 6330 generally provides that the Commissioner cannot           
          proceed with collection by levy until the person has been given             
          notice and the opportunity for an administrative review of the              
          matter (in the form of an Appeals Office hearing) and, if                   
          dissatisfied, with judicial review of the administrative                    
          determination.  Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35, 37 (2000);              
          Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 179 (2000).  In the case of             
          such judicial review, the Court will review a taxpayer’s                    
          liability under the de novo standard where the validity of the              
          underlying tax liability is at issue.  The Court will review the            
          Commissioner’s administrative determination for abuse of                    
          discretion where the validity of the underlying liability is not            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011