Jeffrey and Virginia M. Hambarian - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          disclosure would have been damaging to petitioner’s defense of              
          his criminal case.  Without some showing or assurance that the              
          mental impressions of petitioner’s attorneys would be revealed,             
          the work product doctrine is not applicable under the                       
          circumstances of this case.                                                 
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                             An appropriate order will be             
                                        issued granting respondent’s motion           
                                        to compel.                                    
































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  

Last modified: May 25, 2011