- 46 - the corporate account by yearend constituted taxable income to petitioner; that is, respondent determined that the $1,294,058 transferred from the corporate account to purchase stock in the personal brokerage account, less $757,20229 in stock sales proceeds returned to the corporate account, or $536,856, was additional income to petitioner in 1988. Respondent proposed no adjustment to petitioner’s taxable income as a result of the profitable (or losing) sales of the stocks for which the proceeds were returned to Albank No. 1.30 Thus, respondent’s determination of additional income as a result of the transfers between the corporate Albank No. 1 account and petitioner’s personal FCIS account equaled $536,856, even though stocks purchased with corporate funds totaling $565,478 were retained in petitioner’s FCIS account as the net result of the transfers. In addition, during the first 3 months of 1988, petitioner transferred a total of $450,000 in cash from corporate accounts into the Sam Han account. On July 18, 1988, a check for $80,000 29 For this purpose, respondent treated the stock proceeds returned to the corporate account ($752,702), as well as a $4,500 dividend paid on the Kodak stock on Apr. 4, 1988, and transferred from petitioner’s FCIS account to the corporate Albank No. 1 account on the same day, as amounts returned. 30 Petitioner in any event reported the gains and losses from the sale of all but one of these stocks on his 1988 return (although he now contends that he held the stocks as an agent of his corporations).Page: Previous 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011