- 21 -
physicians, and the estate again cites concerns with the
signature thereon. In light of these concerns and the fact that
the letter does not appreciably add to the information reported
in the admitted medical records, we sustain the estate’s
objection.
The estate’s final objection in the stipulation was to the
admission of Exhibit 29-J, a letter to Michael from decedent’s
doctor, on grounds of relevance and prejudice. These objections,
however, were overruled at trial, and the document was taken into
evidence.
Respondent in the stipulation objected to the admission of
Exhibits 33-J through 37-J, which pertain to the Hawaii
arbitration, on the ground of relevance. On reply brief,
respondent expressly waived objection to these documents.
Exhibits 33-J through 37-J are admitted into evidence.
Respondent also in the stipulation raised relevancy
objections to Exhibits 41-J, 44-J, and 45-J. Since these
documents (a photo of decedent taken in the 1950s and copies of
various checks written for gifts and charitable contributions)
all relate to periods prior to those at issue and do not bear in
any meaningful way on matters considered herein, we sustain
respondent’s objections.
Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011