John W. Hauck, Jr. - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          assessment.  At that time, the Court admonished petitioner that             
          he was wasting the Court’s time.                                            
               At trial, respondent advised the Court that he had provided            
          petitioner with a copy of Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35                
          (2000).  At the conclusion of the trial, respondent argued that             
          petitioner was fighting a frivolous battle and that this case was           
          nothing more than an attempt to further delay the collection                
          activities.  We agree.                                                      
               In the petition, at trial, and on brief petitioner raised,             
          primarily for delay, arguments and contentions that we have                 
          previously rejected, thereby causing the Court to waste its                 
          limited resources.  Accordingly, we shall impose a penalty of               
          $10,000 pursuant to section 6673.                                           
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  An appropriate order and            
                                             decision will be entered.                




















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

Last modified: May 25, 2011