Jack Chien Ching Huang - Page 13




                                       - 12 -                                         
          allow double deductions for the same amount ‘absent a clear                 
          declaration of intent by Congress,’ * * * and we not think                  
          section 162(a) reflects any such intent.”  Brenner v.                       
          Commissioner, 62 T.C. 878, 885 (1975) (quoting United States v.             
          Skelly Oil Co., 394 U.S. 678, 684 (1969)).                                  
               In view of the foregoing, we sustain respondent’s                      
          determination and hold that petitioner is not entitled to any               
          deduction for repayment of principal on the loan from Providian             
          Bank.                                                                       
          C.  Conclusion                                                              
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
               To give effect to our disposition of the disputed issues, as           
          well as the parties’ concessions, see supra note 2,                         


                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          


















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  

Last modified: May 25, 2011