Thu Cuc Thi Huynh - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          verify rental and utility payments.  Finally, respondent again              
          advised petitioner of her right to appeal administratively the              
          proposed changes and enclosed another copy of Publication 5.                
               Petitioner did not respond to respondent’s June 23, 2000,              
          letter, nor did petitioner administratively appeal the proposed             
          changes to her 1999 return.  Accordingly, on October 6, 2000,               
          respondent sent petitioner a notice of deficiency.                          
               The deficiency as determined by respondent was in the amount           
          of $2,347 and was based on the same adjustments as proposed in              
          respondent’s April 21, 2000, letter; i.e., change in petitioner’s           
          filing status from head of household to single (with a                      
          concomitant change in the amount of the standard deduction) and             
          disallowance of the dependency exemption and the earned income              
          credit in respect of petitioner’s son.                                      
               On October 23, 2000, petitioner retained her present                   
          counsel.  Shortly thereafter, on October 29, 2000, petitioner’s             
          counsel sent a letter to respondent requesting that the notice of           
          deficiency be rescinded based on respondent’s concession in                 
          docket No. 18517-99S (the case involving the 1998 year).                    
          Petitioner’s counsel imposed a deadline of November 23, 2000, for           
          respondent to agree to a rescission.  Petitioner’s counsel did              
          not provide any of the information or documentation that                    
          respondent had previously requested in respondent’s letters dated           
          April 21, 2000, and June 23, 2000, to petitioner.                           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011