Dan B. Isaac - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $28,125 in                       
          petitioner’s 1997 Federal income tax and additions to tax under             
          sections 6651(a)(1), (a)(2), and 6654(a) in the respective                  
          amounts of $6,328.12, $4,500, and $1,515.18.  After concessions,2           
          discussed infra, the issues are petitioner’s basis in 600 shares            
          of IBM stock sold by petitioner on September 19, 1997, and                  
          petitioner’s entitlement to a dependency exemption deduction and            
          head of household filing status.  Petitioner resided in New York,           
          New York, at the time the petition was filed.                               
               The facts may be summarized as follows.  Petitioner did not            
          file a Federal income tax return for the 1997 taxable year.  In             
          paragraphs 9 and 10 of the Stipulation of Facts, the parties                
          stipulated that the amount realized by petitioner from the sale             
          of securities was $112,340 and that of this amount “Stock in the            
          amount of $52,419.00 had a cost basis of $39,411.00 resulting in            
          a $13,008.00 gain of which $1,701.00 is long term gain,                     
          $12,286.00 is a short term gain and $979.00 is short term loss.”            
          The parties also agree that the difference between the gross                
          sales ($112,340) and the $52,419 referred to above is $59,9213              


          2  It is stipulated that during 1997 petitioner received (1)                
          Social Security benefits of $11,397, interest income of $39,                
          dividend income of $1,269, and royalty payments of $1,000.  Also,           
          petitioner has never disputed that he is liable for the failure             
          to file and failure to pay additions to tax under secs.                     
          6651(a)(1), (a)(2), and 6654(a).                                            
          3  The brokerage statement shows that the amount received was               
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011