Roxie Lee Jackson - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          The letter stated further that petitioner and his wife                      
          anticipated each of the delinquent returns would show an income             
          tax refund of several thousand dollars and emphasized that                  
          petitioner and his wife did not owe any additional taxes for the            
          years 1993, 1994, and 1995.  The letter stated petitioner and his           
          wife were due refunds for each year.  The letter referenced                 
          petitioner’s Social Security number and was sent on behalf of               
          both petitioner and his wife.  Only petitioner’s wife signed the            
          letter, however.                                                            
               On December 29, 1997, respondent mailed notices of                     
          deficiency for 1993 and 1994 to petitioner.  The notices of                 
          deficiency did not refer to the April 1996 letter.  Petitioner              
          filed a timely petition in response to the notices.                         
               On March 30, 1998, petitioner and his wife filed joint                 
          Federal income tax returns for 1993 and 1994 with the Internal              
          Revenue Service Center at Kansas City, Missouri.  The 1993 and              
          1994 returns reported the following:                                        
                    Income tax                                                        
               Year    withholding    Income tax due    Overpayment                   
               1993      $13,834        $10,414        $3,420                         
               1994      13,658         7,737          5,921                          


               3(...continued)                                                        
          1996 letter was introduced as an exhibit in this case by either             
          party.  Our findings of fact regarding the contents of the April            
          1996 letter are drawn from the testimony of petitioner and his              
          wife, which we concluded was credible.  Respondent did not                  
          contest their description of the April 1996 letter.                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011