Lauren C. Jackson - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          frivolous or groundless arguments that we commonly encounter in             
          tax protester cases; however, we fail to comprehend on what basis           
          petitioner prosecuted this case given her admission that she                
          actually received the January 6, 1999, notice of deficiency 3               
          days after it was issued.  One might therefore wonder whether               
          petitioner instituted this case primarily for delay.  Under the             
          circumstances, however, we shall give petitioner the benefit of             
          the doubt, and we shall not impose a penalty on her pursuant to             
          section 6673(a)(1).                                                         
               In order to give effect to the foregoing,                              


                                             An appropriate order granting            
                                        respondent's motion and decision              
                                        will be entered.                              
























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

Last modified: May 25, 2011