Robert C. and Carol S. Jacobsen - Page 11




                                       - 10 -                                         
          401(a)(9); (2) by amortizing the account balance over a number of           
          years equal to the life expectancy of the account owner or the              
          joint life and last survivor expectancy of the account owner and            
          beneficiary (with life expectancies determined in accordance with           
          section 1.401(a)(9)-1, Proposed Income Tax Regs., 52 Fed. Reg.              
          28081 (July 27, 1987)) at an interest rate that does not exceed a           
          reasonable interest rate on the date payments commence; or (3) by           
          dividing the account balance by an annuity factor (the present              
          value of an annuity of $1 per year beginning at the age attained            
          in the first distribution year and continuing for the life of the           
          account owner) with such annuity factor derived using a                     
          reasonable mortality table and using an interest rate that does             
          not exceed a reasonable interest rate on the date payments                  
          commence.                                                                   
               The parties have stipulated that Mr. Jacobsen received                 
          distributions from his individual retirement account of $16,770,            
          $18,880, $23,330, $33,330, $31,100, and $35,550 in 1992, 1993,              
          1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997, respectively.  At trial, Mr. Jacobsen           
          presented various computations that he said supported his claim             
          that the amounts were substantially equal under the annuity                 
          method described in Notice 89-25, supra.  Respondent contends               
          that the amounts distributed were not the amounts calculated for            
          each year, that petitioners failed to substantiate that the                 
          calculation was based on the correct balance in the retirement              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011