- 10 - 401(a)(9); (2) by amortizing the account balance over a number of years equal to the life expectancy of the account owner or the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the account owner and beneficiary (with life expectancies determined in accordance with section 1.401(a)(9)-1, Proposed Income Tax Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 28081 (July 27, 1987)) at an interest rate that does not exceed a reasonable interest rate on the date payments commence; or (3) by dividing the account balance by an annuity factor (the present value of an annuity of $1 per year beginning at the age attained in the first distribution year and continuing for the life of the account owner) with such annuity factor derived using a reasonable mortality table and using an interest rate that does not exceed a reasonable interest rate on the date payments commence. The parties have stipulated that Mr. Jacobsen received distributions from his individual retirement account of $16,770, $18,880, $23,330, $33,330, $31,100, and $35,550 in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997, respectively. At trial, Mr. Jacobsen presented various computations that he said supported his claim that the amounts were substantially equal under the annuity method described in Notice 89-25, supra. Respondent contends that the amounts distributed were not the amounts calculated for each year, that petitioners failed to substantiate that the calculation was based on the correct balance in the retirementPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011