- 12 - to be distributed. In that same vein, upon receipt, the entire $1,050,000 was deposited into JCC’s bank account that was established for the sole purpose of receiving and, ultimately, distributing the settlement proceeds. Of the $1,050,000 received from Westinghouse, JCC paid $269,000 to The Johnson Corp. for management fees earned in conjunction with West Mill and $492,442 to F. Gardner Parker, Trustee. JCC transferred the remaining $286,737.27 to petitioner and recorded the transfer in its books as a payable due from petitioner.4 Mr. Boswell, who had been working closely with petitioner as treasurer of The Johnson Corp. at the time of the settlement agreement, testified that JCC considered the $1,050,000 received from Westinghouse to be income to JCC. Likewise, JCC reported the $1,050,000 as income on its 1991 corporate income tax return. Petitioner’s contention that his individual participation in the settlement agreement is conclusive evidence of his rights to a portion of the settlement is unfounded. The JCC corporations entered into the settlement agreement to resolve claims concerning the outstanding and defaulted debt owed to Westinghouse. Petitioner was named as a party to the agreement in his individual capacity because he was a guarantor of the loan. The agreement identified and released petitioner as a 4 A nominal portion of the amount was used for administrative expenses.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011