- 9 - D. Whether Petitioner May Exclude His NYSL Winnings Because He Was an Employee of the Nigerian Consulate General 1. The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963 Petitioner contends that he may exclude $1,238,100 that he received from the NYSL in 1996 under either the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, April 18, 1961, 23 U.S.T. 3227,2 or the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, April 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77.3 We disagree. Article 34 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (article 34), supra, provides that diplomatic agents are exempt from all dues and taxes, except: (d) dues and taxes on private income having its source in the receiving State and capital taxes on investments made in commercial undertakings in the receiving State; Similarly, article 49(d) of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (article 49), 21 U.S.T. at 108, provides that consular officers and employees are exempt from all dues and taxes, except: 2 This was ratified by the U.S. Senate, Sept. 14, 1965; ratification deposited, Nov. 13, 1972; entered into force for the United States, Dec. 13, 1972, adopted by the Diplomatic Relations Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-393, 92 Stat. 808, currently codified at 22 U.S.C. sec. 254a (2000). 3 This was ratified by the U.S. Senate, Oct. 22, 1969; ratification deposited, Nov. 24, 1969; entered into force for the United States, Dec. 24, 1969.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011