Kelly V. Kaeckell - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          The transcripts indicated that respondent made assessments                  
          against petitioner on February 14, 2000, for the taxes and                  
          additions to tax set forth in the notice of deficiency dated                
          September 21, 1999, and for statutory interest.  In addition, the           
          transcripts of account indicated that on February 14, 2000,                 
          respondent issued to petitioner notices and demand for payment of           
          the assessed amounts.                                                       
               On May 9, 2001, respondent issued to petitioner a Notice of            
          Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320            
          and/or 6330.  The notice states that the Appeals Office                     
          determined that it was appropriate to proceed with the collection           
          of petitioner’s outstanding tax liabilities by levy.  On May 17,            
          2001, petitioner filed with the Court an imperfect petition for             
          lien or levy action seeking review of respondent’s notice of                
          determination.3  On June 19, 2001, petitioner filed an amended              
          petition alleging that the Appeals officer failed to obtain                 
          verification from the Secretary that the requirements of any                
          applicable law or administrative procedure were met as required             
          under section 6330(c)(1).                                                   


               2(...continued)                                                        
          code that is entered into respondent’s integrated data retrieval            
          system (IDRS) to obtain the transcript.  IDRS is essentially the            
          interface between respondent’s employees and respondent’s various           
          computer systems.                                                           
               3  At the time that the petition was filed, petitioner                 
          resided in Mission, Kansas.                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011