- 13 - musician, (2) were attended by other bands’ members who shared “some different techniques and various things *** that would benefit any professional musician”, and (3) provided exhibits featuring manufacturers and distributors selling professional equipment. While petitioner may have attended seminars and engaged in conversations with various individuals about techniques and equipment at the conventions, we believe that these activities are not “directly connected with or pertaining to” petitioner’s Schedule C business. Sec. 1.162-1(a), Income Tax Regs. The fact that petitioner may have derived some incidental or indirect benefit to his business by attending the conventions is not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of section 162(a). See Henry v. Commissioner, 36 T.C. 879, 884 (1961). The registration forms presented by petitioner at trial clearly establish that the conventions were organized by educational associations for the benefit of music educators. The Texas Music Educators Association Convention Membership Application requested information pertaining to the applicant’s teaching division and level. On the application, petitioner selected that he taught band at the middle school/junior high school level. Petitioner completed the Texas Bandmasters Association Convention Registration Form indicating that he was affiliatedPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011