Paul V. & Dorothy S. Kazunas - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          Petitioners originally denied, however, that they received                  
          refunds for two other years and acknowledged those refunds only             
          after being presented with copies of the canceled checks endorsed           
          by them.  In addition, Mr. Kazunas acknowledged that he made no             
          inquiries pursuing a tax refund in excess of $5,600 for 1987                
          until he saw the transcript of petitioners’ account for 1987.  We           
          conclude that petitioners’ recollection is unreliable as evidence           
          that the refund was not received.                                           
               There is no evidence that the amounts assessed are                     
          erroneous.  Petitioners’ offer to pay less than 10 percent of the           
          amount due, absent their qualifying for an offer in compromise,             
          was unacceptable.  Respondent’s notice of determination was not             
          erroneous.                                                                  
               At trial, petitioners raised issues that were not raised at            
          the Appeals hearing.  No special circumstance here justifies our            
          consideration of issues not raised at the hearing.  See Magana v.           
          Commissioner, 118 T.C. 488 (2002).                                          
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             for respondent.                          













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  

Last modified: May 25, 2011