Curtis B. Keene - Page 20




                                       - 20 -                                         
                    SEC. 6303(a). General Rule.-–Where it is not                      
               otherwise provided by this title, the Secretary shall,                 
               as soon as practicable, and within 60 days, after the                  
               making of an assessment of a tax pursuant to section                   
               6203, give notice to each person liable for the unpaid                 
               tax, stating the amount and demanding payment thereof.                 
               * * *                                                                  
          In particular, the Forms 4340 show that respondent sent                     
          petitioner notices of balance due on the same date that                     
          respondent made assessments against petitioner for the taxes,               
          addition to tax, and accuracy-related penalties determined in the           
          notices of deficiency.  A notice of balance due constitutes a               
          notice and demand for payment within the meaning of section                 
          6303(a).  See, e.g., Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d 531, 536             
          (9th Cir. 1992); Schaper v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-203;              
          Weishan v. Commissioner, supra; see also Hansen v. United States,           
          7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir. 1993).  In addition, other notices were           
          sent to petitioner, at least one of which (the final notice,                
          discussed supra D) petitioner received; likewise, petitioner                
          received the Forms 4340.  Such notices and forms were sufficient            
          to constitute notice and demand within the meaning of section               
          6303(a) because they informed petitioner of the amount owed and             
          requested payment.13  Standifird v. Commissioner, supra; Hack v.            


               13  Thus, we reject petitioner’s argument, which we regard             
          as frivolous and groundless, that notice and demand for payment             
          was not in accord with a Treasury decision issued in 1914 that              
          required a Form 17 to be used for such purpose.  See Davich v.              
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-255; Tapio v. Commissioner, T.C.              
          Memo. 2002-141.                                                             





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011