- 25 - protest the tax laws of this country and to espouse his own misguided views, which we regard as frivolous and groundless. E.g., Tolotti v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-86. In short, having to deal with this matter wasted the Court's time, as well as respondent's, and taxpayers with genuine controversies may have been delayed. Under the circumstances, we shall grant that part of respondent’s motion that moves for the imposition of a penalty in that we shall impose a penalty on petitioner pursuant to section 6673(a)(1) in the amount of $5,000. C. Conclusion We have considered all of petitioner’s arguments that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit and/or irrelevant. In order to give effect to the foregoing, An appropriate order granting respondent's motion and decision for respondent will be entered.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Last modified: May 25, 2011