Sanford M. and Sally Kirshenbaum - Page 12




                                       - 11 -                                         
          section 7491(a)(1), however, the burden of proof shifts to the              
          Commissioner if, inter alia, the taxpayer first introduces                  
          credible evidence with respect to any factual issue relevant to             
          ascertaining the taxpayer’s liability for income tax.12  Higbee             
          v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 442 (2001).  With respect to a               
          taxpayer’s liability for any penalty, however, section 7491(c)              
          places on the Commissioner the burden of production.                        
               A.  The IRA Distribution13                                             
               Generally, any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA is             
          includable in the recipient’s gross income as provided in section           
          72.  Sec. 408(d)(1); sec. 1.408-4(a), Income Tax Regs.  This rule           
          does not apply, however, to any amount distributed from an IRA to           
          the individual for whose benefit the account is maintained if the           
          entire amount is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such                   
          individual not later than 60 days after the distribution.  Sec.             
          408(d)(3); Schoof v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 1, 7 (1998); sec.               
          1.408-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.                                             
               Moreover, Rev. Rul. 78-406, 1978-2 C.B. 157, provides that a           
          transfer of a participant’s IRA funds directly from one trustee             


               12  Sec. 7491(a)(1) is applicable to court proceedings                 
          arising in connection with examinations commencing after July 22,           
          1998.  See Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act            
          of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3001(a), (c)(1), 112 Stat. 685,              
          726, 727.                                                                   
               13  We assume, arguendo, that the Veazie property-IRA                  
          arrangement is not a prohibited transaction under sec. 4975(c)              
          despite its specious characteristics.  See sec. 408(e).                     




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011