Wing Yiu Kwan - Page 13




                                       - 12 -                                         

          for both business and other purposes, such expenses are                     
          deductible only if the travel is primarily related to the                   
          taxpayer's trade or business.  If a trip is primarily personal in           
          nature, expenses incurred are not deductible even if the taxpayer           
          engaged in some business activities at the destination.  Id.                
               Whether travel is related primarily to the taxpayer's trade            
          or business or is primarily personal is a question of fact.  Sec.           
          1.162-2(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.; see also Holswade v.                       
          Commissioner, 82 T.C. 686, 698, 701 (1984).  The amount of time             
          during the period of the trip that is devoted to personal                   
          activity, compared to the amount of time devoted to activities              
          directly relating to the taxpayer's trade or business, is an                
          important factor in determining whether the trip is primarily               
          personal.  Sec. 1.162-2(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.  The taxpayer               
          must prove that the trip was primarily related to the trade or              
          business.  Rule 142(a).                                                     
               Petitioner submitted no documentary evidence to support the            
          claimed deduction for travel, meals, and entertainment expenses.            
          Petitioner admitted that he both conducted business and visited             
          family on his trips to China.  The evidence submitted by                    
          petitioner in support of the travel, meals, and entertainment               
          expenses is insufficient to satisfy the strict substantiation               
          requirements of section 274(d).  Furthermore, the Court is not              
          satisfied that petitioner's trips to China were primarily related           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011