Robert Lee Jr. - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          pretrial preparation, have been consistently and thoroughly                 
          rejected and may be the basis for sanctions.  See also Rowlee v.            
          Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1111, 1119-1122 (1983).  Petitioner’s                 
          response to counsel’s letters was premised on faulty and totally            
          unfounded factual and legal assertions.                                     
               In these circumstances, respondent was entitled to rely on             
          the third-party information.  See Parker v. Commissioner, 117               
          F.3d 785 (5th Cir. 1997); see also sec. 6201(d).  In any event,             
          the facts and documents that were deemed stipulated establish               
          petitioner’s receipt of taxable income.  Petitioner had the                 
          burden of identifying and proving any deductions to which he                
          might be entitled.  See, e.g., Rockwell v. Commissioner, 512 F.2d           
          882 (9th Cir. 1975), affg. T.C. Memo. 1972-133.  He failed to do            
          so and has not shown that respondent’s determination is in any              
          way erroneous.                                                              
               The stipulated facts also satisfy respondent’s burden of               
          production with respect to the additions to tax in issue.  See              
          sec. 7491(c); Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446-449                 
          (2001).                                                                     
               Section 6673(a)(1) provides:                                           
               SEC. 6673.  SANCTIONS AND COSTS AWARDED BY COURTS.                     
                    (a) Tax Court Proceedings.--                                      
                         (1) Procedures instituted primarily for                      
                    delay, etc.--Whenever it appears to the Tax Court                 
                    that–-                                                            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011