- 6 - Respondent’s calculation of petitioner’s tax liability in the notice of deficiency is not in the record. However, based upon the record before us we find that petitioner’s taxable income was determined in the notice of deficiency as follows: RRB benefits $19,845 Other income 10,857 Adjusted gross income (AGI) $30,702 Medical expenses 4,801 Less 7.5% AGI (2,303) Taxes paid 6,976 Total itemized deductions (9,474) Personal exemption deduction (2,700) Taxable income 18,528 According to the explanation provided to the Court with regard to respondent’s concession, respondent: (1) Decreased the taxable income reflected in the notice of deficiency by $13,290 to reflect that portion of the RRB benefits not includable in gross income; and (2) reduced the taxable income by a further $492 to reflect an increased medical expense deduction allowed in light of the change to adjusted gross income. Based on these adjustments to the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioner’s correct taxable income was $4,745 and that the correct amount of the deficiency was $712. It appears, however, that respondent’s calculations are in error in two respects. First, the amount of the increase in the medical expense deduction appears to be too small in light of the change to petitioner’s adjusted gross income. See sec. 213(a). Second, the calculation does not appear to account for a portion of petitioner’s income which is long-term capital gain andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011