- 5 - these arguments have some colorable merit.” Id. (quoting Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417 (5th Cir. 1984), affg. an Order of this Court). Petitioner has again failed to comply with Rule 34(b)(4) and (5) by failing to set forth in his petition any justiciable claim or facts related thereto. Neither were any such claims or facts raised or alleged at trial or at any other time in this proceeding. Petitioner introduced not one iota of credible evidence with respect to any factual issue relevant to ascertaining the tax liability in issue.1 Furthermore, it is clear that petitioner has brought this frivolous case solely for purposes of delay and for the advancement of his personal views. We will therefore dismiss this case and enter a decision against petitioner under Rule 123(b). Rule 123(b) provides: For failure of a petitioner properly to prosecute or to comply with these Rules or any order of the Court or for other cause which the Court deems sufficient, the Court may dismiss a case at any time and enter a decision against the petitioner. The Court may, for similar reasons, decide against any party any issue as to which such party has the burden of proof, and such decision shall be treated as a dismissal for purposes of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this Rule. 1 Because petitioner failed to introduce any credible evidence, he failed to meet the requirements of sec. 7491(a), as amended, so as to place the burden of proof on respondent with respect to any factual issue relevant to ascertaining liability for the tax deficiency in issue. As to the addition to tax and accuracy-related penalty, we find that respondent has satisfied his burden of production under sec. 7491(c) because the record shows that petitioner’s return was filed late. Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438 (2001).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011