Wayne A. McFadden - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
               Stephanie and David made unsuccessful attempts to sell the             
          Atascadero property at different times over the next 2 years.               
          Stephanie and David leased the property to tenants during some              
          portions of the period that they owned the property.  David lived           
          on the Atascadero property during periods he and Stephanie could            
          not find tenants.  In 1993, Stephanie and David ended their                 
          relationship.                                                               
               At some point during or before 1994, Stephanie sold her                
          townhouse in Hercules and built a home in Oakland, California, in           
          which she resided.  While Stephanie lived in Oakland, her mother            
          experienced health problems and moved in with her.                          
               In 1994, respondent examined petitioner’s profit-sharing               
          plan and trust.  Respondent determined that the 1988 loans to               
          Stephanie and Johnathan and the Atascadero loan to Stephanie and            
          David were prohibited transactions under section 4975(c) because            
          they were made to disqualified persons as defined by section                
          4975(e)(2).  Respondent required Stephanie and Johnathan to                 
          correct the prohibited 1988 loans by returning the outstanding              
          loan balances to the plan by December 31, 1994, and that they               
          each pay a 5-percent excise tax and interest.  Johnathan and                
          Stephanie repaid the outstanding balances of their 1988 loans by            
          December 31, 1994.                                                          
               With respect to the Atascadero loan, respondent offered to             
          allow the transaction to be corrected in either of two ways.                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011