Arthur McGee - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
               The first issue for decision is whether petitioner is                  
          entitled to dependency exemption deductions for his two sons.               
          Section 151(c)(1) allows a taxpayer to deduct an exemption amount           
          for each dependent as defined in section 152.  Under section                
          152(a), the term “dependent” means certain individuals over half            
          of whose support was received from the taxpayer during the                  
          calendar year for which such individuals are claimed as                     
          dependents.  Support includes food, shelter, clothing, medical              
          and dental care, education, and the like.  Sec. 1.152-1(a)(2)(i),           
          Income Tax Regs.  Eligible individuals who may be claimed as                
          dependents include, among others, sons of the taxpayer.  Sec.               
          152(a)(1).                                                                  
               In deciding whether an individual received over half of his            
          support from the taxpayer, we evaluate the amount of support                
          furnished by the taxpayer as compared to the total amount of                
          support received by the claimed dependent from all sources.                 
          Turecamo v. Commissioner, 554 F.2d 564, 569 (2d Cir. 1977), affg.           
          64 T.C. 720 (1975); sec. 1.152-1(a)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs.  The            
          taxpayer must initially demonstrate, by competent evidence, the             
          total amount of support furnished by all sources for the taxable            
          year at issue.  Blanco v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 512, 514 (1971).            
          If the amount of total support is not established and cannot be             
          reasonably inferred from competent evidence available to the                
          Court, it is not possible to conclude that the taxpayer claiming            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011