Frederick Leroy McGee, Jr. - Page 9




                                        - 8 -                                         

          have been in the physical custody of each parent for exactly half           
          of each of the years at issue, and not in the custody of                    
          petitioner for a greater portion of either year.                            
               Petitioner presented no corroborative evidence showing that            
          he maintained physical custody of Adam and Jordan for a greater             
          portion of the 1997 or 1998 calendar years than did Ms.                     
          Brittingham.  In fact, petitioner’s own testimony indicates that            
          Adam and Jordan were in the physical custody of Ms. Brittingham             
          for a greater portion of time in each of the years at issue.                
          Petitioner has failed to establish that he has met the custody              
          requirement under section 152(e), and, accordingly, he is not               
          treated as having provided over half the support of Adam and                
          Jordan in each of the years at issue.                                       
               Petitioner’s claim that he is entitled to the dependency               
          exemption deductions because of the advice of an IRS employee is            
          without merit.  This Court has previously held that the                     
          authoritative sources of Federal tax law are statutes,                      
          regulations, and judicial case law and not informal IRS sources.            
          Zimmerman v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 367, 371 (1978), affd. without           
          published opinion 614 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1979); Green v.                    
          Commissioner, 59 T.C. 456, 458 (1972).  Additionally, in order to           
          ensure uniform enforcement of the tax law, the Commissioner must            
          follow authoritative sources of Federal tax law and may correct             
          mistakes of law made by IRS agents or employees.  Dixon v. United           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011