- 15 -
situation would have been to order petitioner to produce the
materials without addressing the protective order. To simply
order such production would, however, place petitioner in the
position of having to seek modification of the Cinpres order and
to bear the expense of same. As a practical matter, petitioner
has not shown why the approach we have chosen (order production
with continued protection under the terms of the protective
order) is not appropriate under the conditions we consider.
To reflect the foregoing,
An order will be issued
granting respondent’s motion to
compel and providing for continued
protection of the materials to be
produced.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011