Metro Leasing and Development Corporation, East Bay Chevrolet Company, a Corporation - Page 22




                                                - 22 -                                                  
            general, section 535(b)(5) permits a reduction for net capital                              
            losses for the taxable year.  Section 535(b)(6) provides for a                              
            reduction for net capital gains, less tax attributable to said                              
            gains.  Finally, section 535(b)(7) makes inapplicable the                                   
            ordering rules for capital losses under section 1212 and provides                           
            for the carryover of the prior year’s net capital loss.                                     
                  The net effect of the provisions regarding capital gains and                          
            losses is to remove them from the accumulated earnings tax base,                            
            irrespective of whether they resulted in gain or loss.                                      
            Respondent has removed the net capital gains in accord with the                             
            statute.  The limitation argued for by petitioner does not                                  
            comport with the statute, because the amount of tax liability                               
            reported by petitioner is not, ultimately, the “tax imposed” by                             
            the statute.                                                                                
                  A similarly worded adjustment and computation for removing                            
            net capital gains from the computation of the personal holding                              
            company tax is provided for in section 545(b)(5).  Like the                                 
            accumulated earnings tax, the personal holding tax is considered                            
            a “penalty” tax.  Taxpayers, in the context of the personal                                 
            holding tax, have made arguments similar to those made by                                   
            petitioner in this case.  They argued that the tax imposed should                           
            equal the tax accrued for purposes of the capital gain                                      
            adjustment.  This Court rejected those arguments, holding that                              
            Congress was aware that taxpayers would not be able to deduct                               







Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011