Craig A. and Roseann B. Miller - Page 13




                                        - 12 -                                        
          different from the law of New York, on which we relied in the               
          Stoller case.                                                               
               California Civil Code section 1526(c) (California Code                 
          section 1526(c))(West Supp. 2002) provides that “the acceptance             
          of a check or draft by a creditor constitutes an accord and                 
          satisfaction when the check or draft is issued pursuant to or in            
          conjunction with a release of a claim.”  The reference to                   
          “release” in California Code section 1526(c) “must therefore                
          contemplate a mutual understanding (not necessarily in writing)             
          that was reached before the debtor issued the check containing              
          the notation.”  Dirs. Guild of Am. v. Harmony Pictures, Inc., 32            
          F. Supp. 2d 1184, 1189 (C.D. Cal. 1998) (emphasis added).  In               
          Dirs. Guild of Am. the court stated that because the parties did            
          not reach a mutual understanding before the issuance of the                 
          check, a letter that the debtor enclosed with the check stating             
          that the check was “full and final payment and settlement of any            
          and all contributions, interest, audit fees, and liquidated                 
          damages” did not constitute a release within the meaning of                 
          California Code section 1526(c).  Id. at 1186, 1189.3                       
               Here, although there was no mutual understanding of a                  


               3In Dirs. Guild of Am. v. Harmony Pictures, Inc., 32 F.                
          Supp. 2d 1184, 1189 (C.D. Cal. 1998) the United States District             
          Court concluded that relevant portions of California Civil Code             
          sec. 1526 and California Commercial Code sec. 3311 are in                   
          conflict, and the court gave effect to the later-enacted                    
          Commercial Code sec. 3311.                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011