Gene and Ciao Newman - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
               On November 13, 1998, respondent received a letter (dated              
          November 8, 1998) from petitioners acknowledging receipt of the             
          notices of deficiency dated September 11, 1998, and challenging             
          their validity.  Petitioners did not file a petition for                    
          redetermination with the Court challenging the notices of                   
          deficiency dated September 11, 1998.                                        
               On March 12, 1999, respondent issued a joint notice of                 
          deficiency to petitioners.  In the notice, respondent determined            
          a deficiency in the amount of $12,049 in petitioners’ Federal               
          income tax for 1997 and an accuracy-related penalty under section           
          6662(a) in the amount of $1,899.31.  The deficiency in income tax           
          was based on respondent’s determination that petitioners failed             
          to report wage income, interest and dividends, capital gain, and            
          an IRA distribution.                                                        
               On April 9, 1999, respondent received a letter (dated March            
          25, 1999) from petitioners acknowledging receipt of the notice of           
          deficiency dated March 12, 1999, and challenging its validity.              
          Petitioners did not file a petition for redetermination with the            
          Court challenging the notice of deficiency dated March 12, 1999.            
               Respondent subsequently made assessments against petitioners           
          for the deficiencies, additions to tax, and accuracy-related                
          penalties determined in the above-described notices of                      
          deficiency.  Respondent also made assessments against petitioners           
          for statutory interest.  On the same day that the assessments               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011