Emily T. Nichols - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          intended to rescind, or that petitioner consented to, rescission            
          of the notice of deficiency mailed to the Bay Harbor Island                 
          address.  Also, there is no evidence that respondent withdrew or            
          otherwise caused the notice of deficiency mailed to the Bay                 
          Harbor Island address to be invalidated.  The issuance of the               
          notice of deficiency on April 13, 1995, is of no consequence                
          because it was not mailed to petitioner’s last known address and            
          was not received.                                                           
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                             An order will be entered                 
                                        granting respondent’s motion to               
                                        dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.             



























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

Last modified: May 25, 2011