Rodney Noble and Jo Marie Payton - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners’ 1995 and            
          1996 Federal income taxes of $14,789 and $12,112 respectively.              
          The issues presented for decision are whether corporate                     
          distributions to Jo Marie Payton (petitioner) were loan                     
          repayments or constructive dividends for the years in issue and             
          whether petitioners received imputed interest income for loans to           
          petitioner’s corporation.                                                   
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The exhibits received into evidence are incorporated herein by              
          reference.  At the time the petition in this case was filed,                
          petitioners resided in Los Angeles, California.                             
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioner is a professional actress.  She is the sole                 
          shareholder of Payton Power Productions, Inc. (PPP), which                  
          provides acting services.  In 1995 and 1996, she served as PPP’s            
          president, secretary, and treasurer.  Petitioner made all of                
          PPP’s financial decisions.  At the end of the calendar year 1995            
          the capitalization of PPP consisted of common stock issued for              
          $1,000 and debt of $601,150.  At the end of 1996 total                      
          liabilities and stockholders’ equity were $649,817 of which                 
          $1,000 was equity.  “Loans from stockholders” as indicated on the           
          corporate returns went from $409,225 in 1995 to $530,067 in 1996.           
               At no time during the years in issue did either PPP or                 
          petitioner execute notes articulating terms of a loan                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011