- 12 -
allegedly purchased from Agama Systems (Agama). When asked if
the invoices were valid receipts, Mr. Nunn testified that he
reconstructed the invoices. Mr. Nunn further testified that he
reconstructed the invoices because he paid cash and did not
receive a receipt for the equipment purchased from Agama.
Katherine Lam (Ms. Lam), an employee of Agama, testified on
behalf of respondent. Ms. Lam testified that the invoices
petitioners submitted were not legitimate Agama invoices and
contained multiple inconsistencies with actual Agama invoices
issued in 1993. Ms. Lam and three of her associates reviewed all
of Agama’s invoices from 1993 and were unable to find any record
of equipment sold to Mr. Nunn. On cross-examination, Ms. Lam
testified that there is no way to purchase equipment from Agama
without generating an invoice.
Petitioners submitted three invoices for car repairs
allegedly for services rendered by Fondren Toyota Service. The
receipts contained discrepancies in the odometer readings when
compared to other receipts for the same vehicle. The three
receipts resemble each other but appear to be different from
another receipt provided by petitioners from the same company.
Mr. Nunn testified that he may also have reconstructed the three
receipts.
The Court found that Mr. Nunn attempted to deceive
respondent and the Court with false documents. Overall, the
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011