- 11 - Examination Assessments While petitioner is not foreclosed from contesting the examination assessments,5 his arguments are unavailing. Petitioner argues herein that the assessments were invalid because the Appeals officer did not rely on or provide to him a Form 23C, Summary Record of Assessment, for purposes of verifying that the assessments were valid. This argument is without merit. The Appeals officer used an MFTRA-X transcript, a copy of which she provided to petitioner at the hearing, to verify that the assessments petitioner challenges, including the examination assessments, were validly made. Absent some showing of irregularity in respondent’s assessment procedures that raises a question about the validity of respondent’s assessments of petitioner’s tax liabilities, which petitioner has not made, it is not an abuse of discretion for an Appeals officer to verify an assessment by means of an MFTRA-X transcript. Standifird v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-245; Holliday v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-67. The MFTRA-X transcripts contain all information necessary to the recordation of an assessment under respondent’s regulations, including the identification of the taxpayer, the character of the liability assessed, the taxable period, and the 5 Certain of the issues raised by petitioner in the instant proceedings under sec. 6330(d) were not raised by him in his request for a hearing or at the hearing. Since all such issues lack merit, we need not decide whether petitioner is entitled to raise them in the instant proceedings.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011