Evelyn Perkins - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          authorizes the Commissioner, after determining a deficiency, to             
          send a notice of deficiency to the taxpayer by certified or                 
          registered mail.  A notice of deficiency is sufficient if it is             
          mailed to the taxpayer at the taxpayer's last known address.  See           
          sec. 6212(b)(1).  If the notice is mailed to the taxpayer at the            
          taxpayer's last known address, actual receipt of the notice by              
          the taxpayer is, for present purposes, immaterial.  See King v.             
          Commissioner, 857 F.2d 676, 679 (9th Cir. 1988), affg. 88 T.C.              
          1042 (1987); Yusko v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 806, 810 (1987);                
          Frieling v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 42, 52 (1983); cf. sec.                   
          6330(c)(2)(B).  In turn, the taxpayer has 90 days (or 150 days if           
          the notice is addressed to a person outside the United States)              
          from the date that the notice is mailed to file a petition for              
          redetermination of the deficiency.  See sec. 6213(a); see also              
          sec. 7502 (treating timely mailing as timely filing).                       
               It is clear in the present case that the notice of                     
          deficiency was mailed to petitioner on September 19, 2001.                  
          Ninety days thereafter was Tuesday, December 18, 2001.  However,            
          the petition was not filed until January 22, 2002, and the                  
          envelope in which it was mailed to the Court is postmarked                  
          December 19, 2001, the 91st day after the notice of deficiency              
          was mailed.  Therefore, it is clear that the petition was not               
          filed (or mailed) within the requisite 90-day period.                       
          Accordingly, it follows that we must dismiss this case for lack             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011