- 5 - Code Section makes me “liable” for income taxes, this provision notifies me that I do not have to file an income tax return; * * * * * * * 7) It should also be noted that I had “zero” income according to The Supreme Court’s definition of income * * * . 8) Please note that my 1997 return also constitutes a claim for refund pursuant to Code Section 6402. 9) I am also putting the IRS on notice that my 1997 tax return and claim or [sic] refund does not constitute a “frivolous” return pursuant to Code Section 6702. * * * * * * * * * * 11) In addition, don’t notify me [t]hat the IRS is “changing” my return, since there is no statute that allows the IRS to do that. You might prepare a return (pursuant to Code Section 6020(b)) where no return is filed, but where, as in this case, a return has been filed, no statute authorizes IRS personnel to “change” that return. * * * * * * * * * * The word “income” is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code. * * * But, as stated above, it can only be a derivative of corporate activity. * * * B. Respondent’s Deficiency Notice and Petitioner’s Response On February 4, 2000, respondent (acting through the Director of the Service Center in Ogden, Utah) issued a joint notice of deficiency to petitioner and his wife for the taxable year 1997. In the notice, respondent determined a deficiency in Federal income tax in the amount of $32,564 and an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) and (b)(1) for negligence orPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011