Geraldine M. and Arthur F. Reid - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
          “an amount received (other than workmen’s compensation) through             
          prosecution of a legal suit or action based upon tort or tort               
          type rights, or through a settlement agreement entered into in              
          lieu of such prosecution.”  Sec. 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs.               
               For the taxpayer’s damages to be excludable from gross                 
          income under section 104(a)(2), the nature of the claim must be a           
          tort or a tort type right.  United States v. Burke, 504 U.S. 229,           
          234 (1992); sec. 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs.  State law                    
          determines the nature of the legal interests involved.  United              
          States v. Mitchell, 403 U.S. 190, 197 (1971).  The taxpayer must            
          also prove that he received the damages on account of personal              
          injuries or sickness.  Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323,              
          330 (1995).  Statutory exclusions from income are to be narrowly            
          construed.  Id. at 328.                                                     
               Fla. Stat. Ann. sec. 440.205 provides as follows:  “No                 
          employer shall discharge, threaten to discharge, intimidate, or             
          coerce any employee by reason of such employee’s valid claim for            
          compensation or attempt to claim compensation under the Workers’            
          Compensation Law.”  Fla. Stat. Ann. sec. 440.205 is a statutory             
          cause of action for wrongful discharge.  Scott v. Otis Elevator             
          Co., 572 So. 2d 902, 903 (Fla. 1990) (citing Smith v. Piezo Tech.           
          & Profl. Admrs., 427 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 1983)).  In Scott v. Otis             
          Elevator Co., supra at 903, the Florida Supreme Court stated:               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011