Brenda H. Robinson - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               On March 25, 1996, petitioner wrote to respondent stating              
          that she was not liable for income tax because she was a “state             
          sovereign” and not a citizen or resident of the District of                 
          Columbia.                                                                   
               Respondent sent a notice of deficiency to petitioner for               
          1994 on January 17, 1997, in which respondent determined that               
          petitioner had a deficiency of $13,257 and was liable for                   
          additions to tax of $3,257 under section 6651(a) and $670 under             
          section 6654(a).  Petitioner received the notice of deficiency              
          but did not file a petition in the Tax Court for 1994.  On                  
          February 13, 1997, petitioner returned the notice of deficiency             
          to respondent stamped “Refused for CAUSE--NOT dishonored!”                  
          Petitioner attached to the notice of deficiency a letter in which           
          she requested copies of the assessment and the delegation order             
          from the Secretary of the Treasury to the Director of the                   
          Internal Revenue Service (IRS) service center who signed the                
          notice of deficiency.                                                       
               On April 21, 1997, petitioner wrote to respondent stating              
          that she was a “Sovereign Citizen of the Florida Republic”, she             
          did not reside or earn income in “any Territory, Possession,                
          Instrumentality, or Enclave” under the jurisdiction of the United           
          States, and she was “not a citizen of the Federal United States             
          subject to its jurisdiction.”  On May 6, 1997, respondent wrote             
          to petitioner that the information in petitioner’s letters did              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011