Thomas S. Russo - Page 6




                                        - 5 -                                         
          the return for each month for which there is a failure to file,             
          not to exceed 25 percent.  Section 6651(a)(2) imposes an addition           
          to tax of 0.5 percent per month up to 25 percent for failure to             
          pay the amount shown as tax on the return.  A taxpayer may be               
          subject to both paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), in                
          which case the amount of the addition to tax under paragraph (1)            
          is reduced by the amount of the addition to tax under paragraph             
          (2) for any month to which an addition to tax applies under both            
          paragraphs.  The combined amounts under paragraphs (1) and (2)              
          cannot exceed 5 percent per month.  Sec. 6651(c)(1).                        

               To avoid the additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and             
          (2), a taxpayer must satisfy the burden of proving that his                 
          failure to timely file returns and pay tax was due to reasonable            
          cause and not due to willful neglect.  See United States v.                 
          Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 245 (1985); E. Wind Indus., Inc. v. United             
          States, 196 F.3d 499, 504 (3d Cir. 1999); Higbee v. Commissioner,           
          116 T.C. 438, 446-447 (2001).1  “Reasonable cause” requires the             
          taxpayer to demonstrate that he exercised ordinary business care            
          and prudence, but nevertheless he was unable to file the return             
          within the prescribed time.  United States v. Boyle, supra at               


          1 Respondent concedes that respondent bears the burden of                   
          production with respect to the additions to tax under sec.                  
          7491(c).  The parties have stipulated that petitioner filed his             
          1996, 1997, and 1998 tax returns in January 2001.  Accordingly,             
          we conclude that respondent has met the burden of production, and           
          petitioner must come forward with evidence sufficient to persuade           
          us that respondent’s determinations and assertions are incorrect.           
          See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 447 (2001).                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011