Jose A. Salazar - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Court any petition for redetermination in respect of the notice             
          of deficiency for 1984 and 1985.                                            
               In October 1988, the Court entered a stipulated decision in            
          docket No. 43255-85 pursuant to the parties’ agreement.  The                
          decision reflects petitioner’s liability for deficiencies in                
          income taxes and additions to tax for 1982 and 1983.                        
               Over the next several years, petitioner attempted to resolve           
          his tax liabilities for 1984 and 1985.  During this period,                 
          petitioner also requested that respondent abate penalties and               
          interest for 1982, 1983, 1984, and 1985.                                    
               By letter dated March 19, 1998, respondent advised                     
          petitioner that because of the Court’s decision in docket No.               
          43255-85, respondent would not abate penalties or interest for              
          1982 or 1983.  However, respondent advised petitioner that                  
          respondent would abate: (1) Assessments of penalties and interest           
          for 1984 (resulting in a credit balance for that year of                    
          $5,451.13); and (2) assessments of tax, penalties, and interest             
          for 1985 (resulting in a credit balance for that year of                    
          $6,378.08).                                                                 
               On September 13, 2000, respondent issued to petitioner a               
          notice of final determination under section 6404 disallowing his            
          claim for abatement of interest for 1982 and 1983.  Petitioner              
          then filed with the Court a timely petition for review, assigned            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011