- 6 - procedure” on a point of law regarding the nature of the income tax. On September 27, 2001, the Court denied this motion. On September 17, 2001, petitioner filed a motion to quash subpoena duces tecum. The subpoena required petitioner to appear 30 minutes before the trial and to bring certain documents with him. On October 5, 2001, the Court denied this motion. On October 23, 2001, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order of October 5, 2001. On October 24, 2001, the Court denied this motion. On December 3, 2001, over a month after the trial of this case, petitioner filed a motion to reconsider the denial of motion to quash subpoena duces tecum. On December 11, 2001, the Court denied this motion. At trial, the Court warned petitioner that his arguments were frivolous and of the provisions of section 6673. Petitioner filed several frivolous documents with the Court. Petitioner’s position, based on stale and meritless contentions, is manifestly frivolous and groundless, and he has wasted the time and resources of this Court. Accordingly, we shall impose a penalty of $12,500 pursuant to section 6673. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: May 25, 2011