John W. Schroeder, Jr. - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
               In order to give effect to the foregoing,                              


                                             An order granting respondent's           
                                        motion and decision for respondent,           
                                        including a penalty on petitioner             
                                        under section 6673(a)(1), will be             
                                        entered.                                      





















               5(...continued)                                                        
          secs. 6601(a), (e)(2), 6622.  Further, petitioner’s allegation              
          regarding not receiving notice and demand is belied by the TXMODA           
          transcript of account, as well as the Nov. 10, 2000, final notice           
          (a copy of which was attached to petitioner’s Request for a                 
          Collection Due Process Hearing), and the collection notice dated            
          Oct. 9, 2000 (see supra “C”).  See, e.g., Hughes v. United                  
          States, 953 F.2d 531, 536 (9th Cir. 1992); Weishan v.                       
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-88; see also Hansen v. United                 
          States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir. 1993).                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  

Last modified: May 25, 2011