- 6 - conceded these issues. We must decide whether petitioner had unreported gross income in 1996. Respondent’s determinations in the notice of deficiency are presumptively correct. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Respondent has the burden of proof for the increased deficiency and penalty asserted in the amendment to answer. Rule 142(a). Because petitioner failed to comply with the requirements to substantiate any item, section 7491 is not applicable except that under section 7491(c), respondent has the burden of production with respect to petitioner’s liability for a penalty. In his petition and memorandum, petitioner makes tax protester arguments that have been repeatedly rejected by this Court and others, including the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (to which this case may be appealed), as inapplicable or without merit. Rowlee v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1111 (1983); McCoy v. Commissioner, 76 T.C. 1027 (1981), affd. 696 F.2d 1234 (9th Cir. 1983). We see no need to repeat these discussions here. Section 1 imposes a tax on the taxable income of individuals. Section 63(b) defines “taxable income”, as applicable to petitioner, as gross income less the standard deduction and one personal exemption. Section 61(a) defines gross income to mean “all income from whatever source derived,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011