- 2 - Respondent determined deficiencies of $6,580 and $4,232 in petitioner’s 1995 and 1996 Federal income taxes, respectively. This Court must decide whether losses claimed by petitioner are subject to the passive activity loss limitations under section 469. Some of the facts in this case have been stipulated and are so found. Petitioner resided in Albany, New York, at the time he filed his petition. During the taxable years at issue, petitioner owned 34.72 percent of the outstanding shares of VBR Corporation (VBR). VBR is an S corporation, which owns and operates bowling alleys. In 1995, VBR sought financing in order to purchase automatic scoring equipment (equipment). Because of VBR’s loss history, the company was unable to obtain the requisite financing. One lender was willing to make a loan directly to petitioner. Petitioner secured the loan and purchased the equipment. Subsequently, petitioner entered into a written lease agreement with VBR reflecting the lease of petitioner’s equipment to VBR (the lease agreement). The lease agreement was effective on August 1, 1995, and would terminate on August 15, 2002. The lease agreement provided for monthly payments to be made by VBR to petitioner in the amount of $3,320.07. VBR was required to maintain the equipment in good condition, to purchase insurance with respect to thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011