Meda Smith - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          classifying the 1988 liability as uncollectible or in failing to            
          take more vigorous collection sooner is immaterial.  This                   
          conclusion is bolstered by the legislative history of section               
          6404, which states:  “if a taxpayer files a return but does not             
          pay the taxes due, this provision would not permit abatement of             
          this interest regardless of how long the IRS took to contact the            
          taxpayer and request payment.”  H. Rept. 99-426, supra at 844,              
          1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) at 844; S. Rept. 99-313, supra at 208, 1986-           
          3 C.B. (Vol. 3) at 208.                                                     
               This is not a case where, after reporting a tax liability on           
          the return and failing to pay it, the taxpayer was misled by                
          incorrect information from respondent to make payment of less               
          than the full balance due.  Cf. Douponce v. Commissioner, T.C.              
          Memo. 1999-398.  Respondent did nothing that would have misled              
          petitioner into believing that the 1988 liability was less than             
          she and Frank reported on their 1988 joint return or that the               
          liability had been previously satisfied.  As far as the evidence            
          shows, respondent never notified petitioner that the 1988                   
          liability had been classified as uncollectible.  In 1990,                   
          respondent notified petitioner that her claimed 1989 refund was             
          being applied to the 1988 liability.  In 1994, petitioner                   
          received a similar notification shortly after claiming a refund             
          on her 1993 tax return.  As far as the record reveals, in neither           
          instance did petitioner inquire of respondent why her claimed               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011