Robert M. and Nancy I. Stewart - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          for 1995 and 1996, respectively.  After concessions,2 the issue             
          for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to deductions              
          for certain amounts that Mr. Stewart paid to a wholly owned                 
          corporation for general management services he performed.                   
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  At the time of filing the           
          petition, petitioners resided in San Jose, California.                      
               Petitioner Robert M. Stewart owned a real estate business,             
          which he operated as a sole proprietorship.  In 1984, Mr. Stewart           
          incorporated R.M. Stewart, Inc., and he was its sole shareholder            
          and director.  The corporation was formed to protect the assets             
          of the sole proprietorship, including the real estate sales                 
          office.3  It was engaged in real estate development, a screen               
          printing sign business, and the operation of a computer company.            


               2Petitioners concede the adjustment to car and truck                   
          expenses of $4,313 and the adjustment to interest expense of                
          $3,430 for 1995; respondent concedes the adjustment to rent                 
          expense of $1,735 for 1995 and $20,000 of the adjustment for                
          commission expenses for 1996.                                               
               3The corporation also provided property management services            
          to certain clients of the sole proprietorship.  The clients were            
          required to list their properties with the sole proprietorship              
          when and if the properties came up for sale.  The sole                      
          proprietorship was prohibited by its franchise agreements from              
          performing those services.  The corporation paid a property                 
          manager for managing the various rental properties involved;                
          however, he did not provide general management services for                 
          either the corporation or the sole proprietorship.                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011